Commentary for Bava Kamma 193:15

א"ל התם לא מינכר היזיקה הכא מינכר היזיקה

These rulings [could apply] only where he has no money claim against the owner, but [in your case], Sir, since you have a money claim against the owner, it looks like usury, exactly as R. Joseph b. Manyumi said [namely] that R. Nahman stated that though the Rabbis decided that one who occupies another's premises without his consent is not liable to pay him rent, if he lent money to another and then occupied his premises he would have to pay him rent.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that it should not look like usury. ');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 193:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.